Hey guys. I'm trying to find a run-of-the-mill paedophile who complains when his kiddie porn gets deleted and thinks that the rest of the world is to blame that he can't see children naked. Any help is greatly appreciated.
Replies 8
0
30 Jan 2014 3:57PM
Hey guys. I'm trying to find a run-of-the-mill paedophile who complains when his kiddie porn gets deleted and thinks that the rest of the world is to blame that he can't see children naked. Any help is greatly appreciated.
Poor attempt at dissing the OP, dickhead.
You call OP a pedo, yet you ignore the fact that the owner and admins running this site are doing their best to attract pedos here by establishing a old category.
The owner pretends he doesn't want pedo content posted here, yet he allows anonymous posters to anonymously upload content without it being approved by his huge fearless team of mods.
You call OP a pedo but you seem to forget that for many years the site owner allowed and encouraged pedo type content to be uploaded here....this is the same site owner who runs the site today. The only reason he stopped the pedo content is pressure from .gov and his advertisers.
If there was no outcry against pedo type content being posted on motherless I guarantee you the guy running this site would still be encouraging people to upload pedo-type content.
So tell me Dickhead, what type of man creates and promotes a category for pedo type content that he calls 'old', instead of what it is, pedo material?
What type of site owner creates a site that encourages people to upload pedo type content and then bans people for uploading perfectly legal non nude pics of teens wearing clothes or bathing suits?
What kind of man encourages or allows his mods to post images espousing racial hatred toward 'NIGGERS' but deletes images of 16 y/o girls wearing bathing suits?
The guy who runs this old site calls himself a "good leader" LOL!!!!! He is more like a pedo enabler.
So which motherless mod are you? Don't matter, they all act like punks and that is because they are all the same person posting here under different nyms.
8
30 Jan 2014 4:22PM
There are so many inaccuracies in your assumptions I'm not going to bother refuting them individually..
motherless is fully compliant with all laws pertaining to content posted here..and takes steps to ensure any illegal content is removed and the uploaders details are forwarded to the relevant authorities..
0
30 Jan 2014 6:10PM
So why are the animal abuse vids still here? It's also illegal, but you don't seem to care.
0
01 Feb 2014 9:54PM
Randomonium evaded the topic of this discussion by writing,
motherless is fully compliant with all laws pertaining to content posted here..and takes steps to ensure any illegal content is removed and the uploaders details are forwarded to the relevant authorities..
Randomonium, how about addressing the substance of what Anonymous is beefing about instead of posting the standard BS reply?
Your reply about Motherless removing illegal images is irrelevant to this discussion because most of us expect Motherless to remove illegal images. 99% of the people who visit this site do not expect or want to see illegal content.
The real question is why does Motherless allow idiots an opportunity to upload and display illegal content that is not old-approved by Motherless.com admins or mods?
Randomonium, how about answering a few questions relevant to the topic being discussed?
Why does mlps.pika777.eu.org have a old category when legal images of people under the age of 18 are not permitted to be uploaded here?
Does this Motherless.com encourage people to upload legal pics of old girls?
Does Motherless ban people for uploading perfectly legal images of old teens?
Of course I do not expect Randomonium to offer a cogent, intelligent reply because it is impossible to reconcile or justify this site's old category with the site's TOS policy for posting over 18 content.
1
01 Feb 2014 6:16AM
ahhhh paedophiles defending paedophiles. well done scumbag
0
02 Feb 2014 5:25AM
FWIW, old doesn't necessarily = pedophile.
Pedophile generally implies an attraction to prepubescence youths.
A "well developed" (post pubescent) girl that happens to be 15 is old and still illegal to post explicit/sexual material of, but she's not pedo material.
Of course, white knight faggots generally don't acknowledge that distinction:
"18 year old that looks 12, tear her cunt apart with your cock, 17.99 years that looks 25, you're a pedo sick fuck for being attracted to her"
1
03 Feb 2014 8:14AM
it's not about how old the child looks. it's about how mentally mature they are, and a child may not have a brain developed enough yet to cope with what you sick fucks want to do to it, hence, why many abuse victims are fucked up for life. the age of consent is there for are reason, to stop sick cunts like you from mentally destroying a small human being before they even have a chance to develop. but I guess that's what you pedo's like. the fact that you have control over someone that can do nothing to challenge you or fight back. yeah, you'd love that you horrible little fucker. why not try it with someone who can fight back you little bitch. the fact that you're even defending this just goes to show what kind of piece of shit cunt you really are. you should be on a register somewhere to let parents know when you move into a neighbourhood. hopefully you don't have any children of your own, wouldn't truct you around any kids you little bitch. real men bash peado's, little bitches try to justify their own sick thoughts and defend them.
