My dirty latina whore wife is waiting for her client in a hotel room downtown. She looks into the mirror at herself and loves what she sees. She loves her job and I encourage her 100%.
Images
231B1B
thonghero84
264
Groups
Sex at work, with your boss or employes
10,305 Uploads
· 2,064 Members
· 16 Forum Posts
· 1,181,959 Visitors
Sex at work, with your boss or employes. Hidden camra at work, or with client to get a raise...
Steam
4 Uploads
· 18 Members
· 0 Forum Posts
· 6,328 Visitors
Steam is an Internet-based digital distribution platform developed by Valve Corporation offering digital rights management (DRM), multiplayer, and social networking. Steam provides the user with installation and automatic updating of games on multiple computers, and community features such as friends lists and groups, cloud saving, and in-game voice and chat functionality. The ...
CamelToe Slide, Pussy Job, Pussy Grind
61 Uploads
· 264 Members
· 4 Forum Posts
· 64,445 Visitors
CamelToe Slide, Pussy Job, Pussy Grind, Stripper slide, it's all the same sexy act. Simply drop your panties-lube up (if needed) straddle him (or her) and let your delicious pussy lips straddle his cock while you slide/glide your hips back and forth. You are now bateing him with your pussy!! Excitement for both & yes very naughty. He wont last long as he feels you glide along his cockhead and he watches you undulate above him. Now try it on your lover, friend, client soon and be sure to upload a video!!
Board Posts
news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57552225-38/senate-bill-rewrite-lets-feds-read-your-e-mail-without-warrants/
A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans' e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law, CNET has learned.
Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns, according to three individuals who have been negotiating with Leahy's staff over the changes. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans' e-mail, is scheduled for next week.
Leahy's rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies -- including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission -- to access Americans' e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge.
CNET obtained a draft of the proposed amendments from one of the people involved in the negotiations with Leahy; it's embedded at the end of this post. The document describes the changes as "Amendments intended to be proposed by Mr. Leahy."
It's an abrupt departure from Leahy's earlier approach, which required police to obtain a search warrant backed by probable cause before they could read the contents of e-mail or other communications. The Vermont Democrat boasted last year that his bill "provides enhanced privacy protections for American consumers by... requiring that the government obtain a search warrant."
Leahy had planned a vote on an earlier version of his bill, designed to update a pair of 1980s-vintage surveillance laws, in late September. But after law enforcement groups including the National District Attorneys' Association and the National Sheriffs' Association organizations objected to the legislation and asked him to "reconsider acting" on it, Leahy pushed back the vote and reworked the bill as a package of amendments to be offered next Thursday. The package (PDF) is a substitute for H.R. 2471, which the House of Representatives already has approved.
One person participating in Capitol Hill meetings on this topic told CNET that Justice Department officials have expressed their displeasure about Leahy's original bill. The department is on record as opposing any such requirement: James Baker, the associate deputy attorney general, has publicly warned that requiring a warrant to obtain stored e-mail could have an "adverse impact" on criminal investigations.
Christopher Calabrese, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, said requiring warrantless access to Americans' data "undercuts" the purpose of Leahy's original proposal. "We believe a warrant is the appropriate standard for any contents," he said.
An aide to the Senate Judiciary committee told CNET that because discussions with interested parties are ongoing, it would be premature to comment on the legislation.
Marc Rotenberg, head of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said that in light of the revelations about how former CIA director David Petraeus' e-mail was perused by the FBI, "even the Department of Justice should concede that there's a need for more judicial oversight," not less.
Markham Erickson, a lawyer in Washington, D.C. who has followed the topic closely and said he was speaking for himself and not his corporate clients, expressed concerns about the alphabet soup of federal agencies that would be granted more power:
There is no good legal reason why federal regulatory agencies such as the NLRB, OSHA, SEC or FTC need to access customer information service providers with a mere subpoena. If those agencies feel they do not have the tools to do their jobs adequately, they should work with the appropriate authorizing committees to explore solutions. The Senate Judiciary committee is really not in a position to adequately make those determinations.
The list of agencies that would receive civil subpoena authority for the contents of electronic communications also includes the Federal Reserve, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Maritime Commission, the Postal Regulatory Commission, the National Labor Relations Board, and the Mine Enforcement Safety and Health Review Commission.
Leahy's modified bill retains some pro-privacy components, such as requiring police to secure a warrant in many cases. But the dramatic shift, especially the regulatory agency loophole and exemption for emergency account access, likely means it will be near-impossible for tech companies to support in its new form.
A bitter setback
This is a bitter setback for Internet companies and a liberal-conservative-libertarian coalition, which had hoped to convince Congress to update the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act to protect documents stored in the cloud. Leahy glued those changes onto an unrelated privacy-related bill supported by Netflix.
At the moment, Internet users enjoy more privacy rights if they store data on their hard drives or under their mattresses, a legal hiccup that the companies fear could slow the shift to cloud-based services unless the law is changed to be more privacy-protective.
Members of the so-called Digital Due Process coalition include Apple, Amazon.com, Americans for Tax Reform, AT&T, the Center for Democracy and Technology, eBay, Google, Facebook, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, TechFreedom, and Twitter. (CNET was the first to report on the coalition's creation.)
Leahy, a former prosecutor, has a mixed record on privacy. He criticized the FBI's efforts to require Internet providers to build in backdoors for law enforcement access, and introduced a bill in the 1990s protecting Americans' right to use whatever encryption products they wanted.
But he also authored the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, which is now looming over Web companies, as well as the reviled Protect IP Act. An article in The New Republic concluded Leahy's work on the Patriot Act "appears to have made the bill less protective of civil liberties." Leahy had introduced significant portions of the Patriot Act under the name Enhancement of Privacy and Public Safety in Cyberspace Act (PDF) a year earlier.
One obvious option for the Digital Due Process coalition is the simplest: if Leahy's committee proves to be an insurmountable roadblock in the Senate, try the courts instead.
Judges already have been wrestling with how to apply the Fourth Amendment to an always-on, always-connected society. Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police needed a search warrant for GPS tracking of vehicles. Some courts have ruled that warrantless tracking of Americans' cell phones, another coalition concern, is unconstitutional.
The FBI and other law enforcement agencies already must obtain warrants for e-mail in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee, thanks to a ruling by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2010.
My wife used to be a Dominatrix in college. She says she didn’t have sex with clients and I mostly believe her but she doesn’t like to talk about it. What types of things does a dominatrix do?
I've been fucking my secretary for 6 months, it started when she asked for some overtime as her and husband are in financial trouble. I told her she can have all the ovrtime she wants if she'll perfom any sexual favour I ask. I took her nal cherry last week, I think I may ahve made her cry. Hubby knows nothing. I am thinking of renting her out to a couple of clients.
Eating my latina whore wife out in between clients in her hotel room. Good job baby!
I'm a 21 yo college student in the Dallas area, majoring in Psychology. I'm also a whore who sells her body to any man willing to pay the right price. I especially love getting fucked as hard and deep as possible in my ass or taking an uncovered cock all the way down my young throat. I often take clients during the day before class, or in the break time between two classes, so that when I get to class I've been freshly and thoroughly fucked. And no, this is not an advertisement, it is just confessing of the truth. I will not respond to people asking for contact info.
mother slapped by clients
Some people call me a hero, I have no problems with that. It helps with the ladies when you say you've rescued people, saved lives, made a real difference in the world. They lap that shit up like puppies with milk. I don't do it for the pussy, and I don't do it for the accolades. Truth is, right now, I don't know why I do it.
There's a scene in the new Superman movie, and Superman's mum says "save the world if you want, or don't do anything if you don't - you don't owe them a damn thing". I've been thinking about that line recently, ever since I saw the trailer. I've lived my life by the Uncle Ben philosophy, that with great power comes great responsibility. There's something noble about using your gifts to save lives, there's a sense of moral obligation when you are as massively well-endowed as myself. I've lived my life according to that philosophy for as long as I can remember, but now, I'm tired.
You might wonder what I do that makes me so great. So I'll tell you. I'm a gigolo, a male prostitute. I'm one of the best in the business. I make women come, and come hard. I make women get in touch with their bodies and orgasm like a slut. I give them my time and and concern, and in return, they give me a lot of money. So I'm rich beyond my lifestyle, and I have a fulfilling job that makes people happy. No one gets hurt, it's all happy smiles and laughter.
But lately, I've been thinking that there must be more to life. I live in the shadows, basically. At parties, when people ask me what to do, I'm momentarily speechless, and then I lie. I tell them I do charity work, build homes in 3rd world countries and shit like that. I lied like that so many times that I actually started going out to do it, just so I knew what I was talking about. And now that's my life. I build homes for dirt-poor communities, hook them up with solar power for heating and water. I love it, it's rewarding in a way that's socially acceptable. I've pretty much stopped my prostitution business except for a few long-term clients who wouldn't be able to cope without my visits.
But even then, it's hard to do this for the rest of my life. So I've decided to be Batman. I want to run around town in a hood and cape and beat the crap out of evil-doers. I'm rich enough to mod my car into the batmobile. Does anyone want to join me?
IV been extra close latly with my daughter.(18, plz don't remove this post again, its consenting adults) we haven't ever done anything sexual,at least not yet. currently we've however been involved in a joint venture of selling her panties on ebanned.(yes that was an earlier confession) I never thought of her as sexual until just recently. and between her conversations and customers I have found what I consider "personal" growth. I'm actually geting aroused by her posing for the pics I take for the listings. and flatly clients have offered money to do nudes... we were timid to do those at first be because I'm her father and all. but we both felt we would be mature about it. and it was just bussiness. not like we were having sex or anything....and it wasn't like she was masterbaiting (at first)
eventually she did work her way up to those requests. I set CAM on tripod and left the room the first few times. the last time I was in the room because she was having trouble keeping her head off screen and her goods in the shot... was a pain in the ass for her the previous times. now we have laid down cretin ground rules..and they have been either pushed or bended because of customer requests. I'm not sure I'm read to have sex with her(yet) but I definitely think that I would enjoy watching her swallow a glass of my cum. based on me taking the position of its only business, its only human cum(very natural). I think she might go for it especially since she seems to have an affinity for the flavor.(from a past conversation with her) the only thing is I think I would need a client to request it.seems like a hassle. if anyone else base a better suggestion on how to bring it up. would be very thankful. will post win if successful.
I must confess... I was showing a client my hot boss's condo so I had her keys. I left early and went inside her condo. I went into her bedroom and found her panty drawer... She has mostly sexy lacy panties. Then I found her dirty clothes bin... I found a pair of her used panties... They had a nice pussy juice stain on them so they seemed freshly warn. I smelt the crotch of her panties... She has such a sweet smelling pussy I jerked off right in her bedroom and came while sniffing her pussy juices. Now every time I look at my boss I dream of her sweet smeling pussy and what it would feel like to cum inside her.
What do you think of my clients hot sweaty body? What would you have in mind?
My wife is such a horny slut ! She is drop dead good looking. 29 yo, Blond hair blue eyes, ass to die for, perky tits. She wears super short skirts to work with no panties, because she says it turns her on.
She cuts hair for a living, mostly male clients. She flirts with them nonstop because the tips are better. On numerous occasions she has taken off the cape after their cut to find them stroking their cocks under it. One guy offered her a two hundred dollar tip if she watched him finish (which she did). I swear they can tell her smooth little slit is inches away as she cuts. She is such a slut I believe she would lock the salon door and ride any one of them. I find myself fantasizing that she does just that. Its kind of a turn on when all these guys jerk off to your wife !
Nude Vista Content
Late Punished Delivery Gal: I Screw the Client So This chab Won't Report Me to the Boss
15:06
10K
picking up my beloved DIDI client out of a brassiere, I convince him to screw!
35:06
11.5K
Masseuse Emily Pink wants that client's hard cock
07:27
6K
Slender masseuse Christy Lee rides a client's cock
07:46
19.8K
Latina Emily Pink slides on client's BBC
07:47
10.7K
Masseuse Emily Pink licks client Haizea Diamond's wet pussy
07:25
13.7K
